As soon there is rules your in to trouble, and if it also includes a Gi the problem is growing... Less rules and a minimum of "special-outfits" its a good guide-line. MMA, Thai-boxing and/or SW have all rules and competitions, but is by my opinion some good complements for K-M.
At first, for fun. Then a i got the impression that there wasn't any K-M club close to Jon's college, and in that case its a good idea to train something you can use as a good complement to K-M. Eyal told me once, "to be really good at all aspects in K-M you have to, besides your K-M training, also train to be a good boxer, good at Muay-Thai and S-W/MMA.
I think its good to have a broad scale to work out from. Take a current example as Kettlebells, anyone who wants to be a better fighter is working out with Kettlebells. Why? not to throw them after bad guys;-)
I took Hap Ki Do for about a half year and I liked it alot but thats not saying much cause I've never taken anything else. Sorry I cant be more of a help.
Permalink Reply by Will on February 2, 2009 at 5:31pm
I have years of experience with karate, and it's easy to see TKD is very much Korea's answer to karate, so I put them both in the same basket. There is much to borrow from many arts - many arts have things worth learning. Unfortunately, karate isn't one of them. I have never found any practical use for all my years of karate training. Will
I have heard that Bas Rutten's program fits well with KM. However, I find that mixing reality based training with a sport can hurt one's performance in a critical incident. I usually suggest one spend some time "soul searching" (for lack of a better phrase) before making that kind of leap. Some people simply cannot switch gears well enough to do what is necessary in a street situation once getting into the habit of training a sport. Then they get hurt. It just isn't worth it, in my humble opinion.
Permalink Reply by Will on February 2, 2009 at 9:28pm
I agree entirely with the spirit of this note! Many arts have things to contribute to the well rounded, well equipped fighter, and KM is one of the arts that has borrowed extensively. However, one needs to be very thoughtful about what to borrow (a technique? part of a technique? an attitude?) and equally careful about how to integrate it into one's program. I too have borrowed extensively from a variety of arts but when, for eg, a Thai fighter sees how I use Thai elbows or knees, he likely will barely recognize it as his own technique. I don't use them in the same range / same manner as the Thai's. Muay Thai rewards flash, flying elbows delivered from 6 feet away, and airborne knee attacks that are at head level ... they're exciting techniques judges reward in the sport (entertainment) ring. On the street ... they get a fighter dead because they are low-probability moves that are easily countered. But when delivered from an upright clinch ... they aren't flashy but they are devastating, high-probability moves delivered to very vulnerable targets (elbows to face and throat; knees to groin and thigh).